Cases 1 - 7 of 7
EATON et al v. MYLAN LABORATORIES LTD. et al
as 1:2023cv04114
Plaintiff:
GERALD LEE EATON and NANCY P. EATON
Defendant:
MYLAN LABORATORIES, LTD., MYLAN N.V., MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bloomer v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05702
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lee Bloomer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hogue v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02839
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lee Hogue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moen et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2014cv01573
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lee Moen and Lynn Moen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
West v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2013cv02685
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lee West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Abney et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv04213
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Abney , Therese Andrezewski , Arthur Lee Archer and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Abney et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 4:2013cv02557
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Abney , Therese Andrezewski , Arthur Lee Archer and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC. , Sanofi-Aventis U.S., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
