Cases 61 - 70 of 101
Garcia et al v. Terra Firma Farms, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00904
Plaintiff:
Miguelina Garcia , Gerardo Garcia and Carlos Garcia
Defendant:
Terra Firma Farms, Inc. , Efrain Sylva Cruz and D. Campos, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garcia v. Strike, LLC
as 2:2014cv00071
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Garcia
Defendant:
Strike, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Dickey v. 3S Services, LLC
as 2:2013cv00402
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dickey, JB Burns, Jr, Quentin B Burns and others
Defendant:
3S Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Gerardo Garcia v. FCC Coleman - USP I Warden
as 13-15201
Petitioner - Appellant:
GERARDO GARCIA
Respondent - Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN - USP I WARDEN
USA v. Gerardo Garcia
as 13-41149
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GERARDO GARCIA
Martinez et al v. Kindred Spirits, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01792
Plaintiff:
Ana Matilde Martinez and Hans Gerardo Garcia-Jordan
Defendant:
Kindred Spirits, Inc., Cona Investment, Inc., Universal Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 3:2013cv02888
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Garcia
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., The Bank of New York Mellon, Recontrust Company, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-55574
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Landmark Fences Company, Inc.
as 13-55509
Debtor:
In the Matter of: LANDMARK FENCES COMPANY, INC.
Appellant:
JAMES SAHAGUN and GERARDO GARCIA
Appellee:
LANDMARK FENCES COMPANY, INC., a California corporation
Garcia v. United States Of America
as 1:2013cv00044
Petitioner:
Luis Gerardo Garcia
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
