Cases 1 - 10 of 11
United States of America v. Marble Arms Corp. Game Getter Combination Firearm Cal:22/410 Serial Number 12044
as 2:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Marble Arms Corp. Game Getter Combination Firearm Cal:22/410 serial number 12044
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Evans v. Chapman et al
as 4:2023cv10263
Plaintiff:
Alrelio L. Evans
Defendant:
Willie Chapman, Kristopher Steece, Vann and others
Getter v. Corrigan
as 1:2022cv00329
Petitioner:
Stephen Getter and Stephen Robert Getter #409209
Respondent:
Warden James Corrigan and James Corrigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crawford #560561 v. Detroit, City of, et al
as 2:2020cv00256
Defendant:
G. Jack, Darryl Cross, George Wood and others
Plaintiff:
Seanderyl Crawford #560561
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Southeast Michigan Surgical Hospital, LLC et al v. Littles
as 2:2018cv13895
Plaintiff:
Southeast Michigan Surgical Hospital, LLC, Spine LLC, Summit Medical Group PLLC and others
Defendant:
Maurice Littles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mobley v. Jordan et al
as 1:2017cv11326
Plaintiff:
Dale Mobley
Defendant:
Jordan, Keller, Delvmink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mobley #367870 v. Jordan et al
as 1:2017cv00325
Plaintiff:
Dale D. Mobley #367870
Defendant:
Unknown Jordan, Unknown Keller, Unknown Delvmink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer et al v. Elrod et al
as 4:2016cv13665
Plaintiff:
Derrick Palmer and Philip W. Berryman
Defendant:
Elrod, George Stephenson, Kristopher Steece and others
Getter #184843 v. Woods et al
as 2:2012cv00415
Plaintiff:
Michael Alaf Getter #184843
Defendant:
Jeff Woods, Daniel H. Heyns, Unknown Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Alaf Getter v. Jeffrey Woods
as 2:2012cv11705
Petitioner:
Michael Getter
Respondent:
Jeffrey Woods
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
