Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lean On Us Home Care, LLC et al v. Gifford et al
as 3:2023cv00864
Plaintiff:
Lean On Us Home Care, LLC and Evgjieni Baca
Defendant:
Dierdre Gifford and John F. McCormick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lean On Us Home Care, LLC et al v. Department of Social Services
as 3:2022cv00705
Plaintiff:
Lean On Us Home Care, LLC and Evgjieni Baca
Defendant:
Department of Social Services, Dierdre Gifford and John F. McCormick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jordan v. Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00701
Plaintiff:
Victor Lamond Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Rollin Cook, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
Robert Burke
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, Angel Quiros, Deidre S. Gifford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Nolan Evans
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Kristine Barone, Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv01467
Plaintiff:
Nolan Evans
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Kristine Barone, Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlone v. Lamont et al
as 3:2020cv01288
Defendant:
Chief Court Administrator, David Lehman, Edward M. Lamont and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew S Carlone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tirado v. Gifford
as 3:2020cv01247
Defendant:
Diedre S. Gifford and Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Christina Tirado
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jordan v. Gifford et al
as 3:2019cv01628
Defendant:
Russell, E Tugie, Scott Maro and others
Plaintiff:
Victor L Jordan, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
