Cases 1 - 10 of 225
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
(PC) Smith v. Uzma et al
as 2:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Donald Joshua Smith
Defendant:
Chaudhry Uzma, Gena Jones, Gill Amandeep and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jackson v. Rivera et al
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Cornel Jackson
Defendant:
Rivera, Schmalls, Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Guerrero-Vasquez v. Gill et al
as 2:2023cv01206
Plaintiff:
Francisco Javier Guerrero-Vasquez
Defendant:
Manpreet Singh Gill and Harbor Trucking Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
(PC) Gill v. County of Placer et al
as 2:2023cv00890
Plaintiff:
Damandeep Singh Gill
Defendant:
County of Placer, Wayne Woo and Nelson Resendes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
(PC) Talavera v. Ravijot et al
as 1:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Jose Alfredo Talavera
Defendant:
Dr. Gill Ravijot, Dr. Francisco Hernandez, April Bravo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
