Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Maurer v. Lincoln Memorial University et al (TV1)
as 3:2020cv00395
Defendant:
Samantha Hardin, Jason Kishpaugh, April James and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Maurer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. State of Mississippi et al
as 2:2017cv02866
Plaintiff:
Anthony Robinson
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Deanne B. Saltzman, Cindy Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deal et al v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC et al (PLR1)
as 1:2017cv00162
Defendant:
CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC , Hamilton County, Tennessee , Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Anne Deal and Bruce Deal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Holmes v. Jackson et al
as 1:2015cv01253
Plaintiff:
Sontus Holmes
Defendant:
City of Jackson , Mayor Jerry Gist , Police Chief Gill Kendrick and others
Miscellaneou:
Kathy Blount
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Mississippi Department of Employment Security et al
as 2:2015cv02653
Plaintiff:
Anthony Robinson
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Employment Security, Cindy Gill, Andrew Howorth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abrahamsen et al v. City of Jackson, Tennessee et al
as 1:2013cv01109
Plaintiff:
Kate Abrahamsen and Keith Abrahamsen
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Tennessee , Gill Kendrick and Diana Vraney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
