Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lauter v. Katoskie et al
as 2:2023cv00649
Plaintiff:
Robert Lauter
Defendant:
Joseph John Katoskie, III, Kamala Lanetti, George Schaeffer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Lauter v. Schaefer, et al
as 2:2020cv00507
Plaintiff:
Robert Lauter
Defendant:
Amy Burnham, Jane Katoskie, George E. Schaefer, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Klahn v. Glaxosmithkline Inc. GSK.
as 7:2019cv00365
Defendant:
Glaxosmithkline Inc. GSK.
Plaintiff:
Michelle R. Klahn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lauter v. The U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) et al
as 2:2019cv00157
Plaintiff:
Robert Lauter
Defendant:
The U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Glaxosmithkline (GSK) and The Commonwealth of Virginia (commonwealth)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lauter v. Glaxosmithkline
as 2:2016cv00716
Plaintiff:
Robert Lauter
Defendant:
Glaxosmithkline
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Collier et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2016cv00052
Plaintiff:
Deijon Collier and Tamika Collier
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC , Smithkline Beecham Corporation , Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williford et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as 3:2015cv00683
Plaintiff:
Nicole Williford and Norris Williford, Sr.
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Glaxo Group Limited et al v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv01481
Plaintiff:
Glaxo Group Limited , SmithKline Beecham Limited and Glaxosmithkline Consumer Healthcare GMBH & Co. KG
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
SAJ Distributors, et al v. SmithKline Beecham, et al
as 2:2004cv00023
Plaintiff:
SAJ Distributors, Inc. and Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corp. doing business as GlaxoSmithKline and GlaxoSmithKline PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
