Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Pate v. Haney
as 4:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
William Glen Pate, Jr
Defendant:
Sarah Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shelton v. Stribling
as 3:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Shirley Shelton
Defendant:
Glen H Stribling
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Logan v. Cox et al
as 2:2022cv02187
Plaintiff:
Glicenia Carmela Logan
Defendant:
James O Cox, P.K. Holmes, III, David Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Dotson v. Yates
as 2:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
Glen Thomas Dotson
Defendant:
John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sims v. Jonesboro Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Harold Shawgnessy Sims
Defendant:
Jonesboro Police Department, Does Arresting Officer, Jonesboro Police Department; Owners, Haven Hotel; Management, Haven Hotel; Clerk, Haven Hotel, Rick Eliott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Teddy Glen Howard
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Toney v. Payne
as 4:2022cv00533
Plaintiff:
Glen Toney
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace et al v. Evergreen Packaging LLC
as 4:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
Taiwan Wallace, Roger Davis, Michael Sturdivant and others
Defendant:
Evergreen Packaging LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Hill v. Cox et al
as 3:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Parris Marshay Hill
Defendant:
Brent Cox, Robert Case, Alicia Houble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Rowland et al
as 3:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Parris Marshay Hill
Defendant:
Falicia Rowland, Robert Case, Brent Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
