Cases 11 - 20 of 21
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv16124
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GLENN EDWARD WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Nutt et al
as 2:2019mc03903
Garnishee:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Glenn Edward Nutt
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Nutt et al (MAG+)
as 2:2019mc03900
Garnishee:
Morgan Stanley
Defendant:
Glenn Edward Nutt
Plaintiff:
United States of America
USA v. Glenn McKennie, Jr.
as 19-12859
Defendant / Appellant:
GLENN EDWARD MCKENNIE, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ball v. Jones et al
as 1:2013cv01725
Petitioner:
Glenn Edward Ball
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and Carla Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Manus v. Secretary, DOC et al
as 2:2013cv00425
Petitioner:
Glenn Edward Manus
Respondent:
Secretary, DOC and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McNeal v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2012cv01838
Petitioner:
Glenn Edward McNeal
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ard et al v. National Football League et al
as 1:2012cv02346
Plaintiff:
William Ard , Martha Ard , William Banks and others
Defendant:
National Football League and NFL Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rattenbury v. Napurski
as 3:2010cv00458
Plaintiff:
Francine Lynn Rattenbury
Defendant:
Glenn Edward Napurski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Acker v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00377
Plaintiff:
Deborah Acker, Zipporah Acklin, Jamie Seals and others
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Blanche Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
