Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Davis v. Global Tel*Link Corporation (GTL)
as 5:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Gavin B. Davis
Defendant:
Global Tel*Link Corporation (GTL) doing business as ViaPath Technologies (ViaPath)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
SHIN v. GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION A/K/A VIAPATH TECHNOLOGIES
as 5:2024cv00473
Defendant:
Global Tel*link Corporation and ViaPath Technologies (ViaPath)
Plaintiff:
DON SHIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Williams et al
as 4:2023cv01040
Plaintiff:
Gregory Williams and Global Tel*Link Corporation d/b/a ViaPath Technologies
Bogamy et al v. Harrison
as 2:2011cv00088
Defendant:
Harrison County, County Harrison, Paula Mooty and others
Guardian Ad Litem:
Kurt Truelove
Plaintiff:
Candle Bogamy, Julius, Sr. Maloy, Lela M Maloy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pompura v. Visa, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00518
Plaintiff:
Shane M Pompura
Defendant:
Visa, Inc., Metabank, Meta Bank Financial Group and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Securus Technologies Inc v. Global Tel*Link Corporation
as 3:2016cv01338
Defendant:
Global Tel*Link Corporation
Plaintiff:
Securus Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Securus Technologies Inc v. Global Tel*Link Corporation
as 3:2016cv01337
Plaintiff:
Securus Technologies Inc
Defendant:
Global Tel*Link Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Securus Technologies Inc v. Global Tel*Link Corporation
as 3:2016cv01336
Plaintiff:
Securus Technologies Inc
Defendant:
Global Tel*Link Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Securus Technologies Inc v. Global Tel*Link Corporation
as 3:2014cv04233
Plaintiff:
Securus Technologies Inc
Defendant:
Global Tel*Link Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
