Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Simon v. Manhattan Mini Storage LLC
as 19-3809
Defendant / Appellee:
John Doe 2, N.Y.P.D. ex-cop, AKA Hector, One City Mission Inc., Robert McPhillips, Urban Pathways, Inc. and others
Defendant:
McKinney's Shelter, AKA McGuinness Shelter, BRC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Simon
Simon v. New York Common Pantry et al
as 1:2019cv10627
Defendant:
Manhattan Carpets, Inc., Civil Court of The City of New York, Urban Pathways, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Simon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simon v. Manhattan Mini Storage LLC
as 19-3165
Defendant / Appellee:
John Doe 2, N.Y.P.D. ex-cop, AKA Hector, Robert McPhillips, Urban Pathways, Inc., One City Mission Inc. and others
Defendant:
McKinney's Shelter, AKA McGuinness Shelter, BRC and New York Common Pantry
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Simon
Simon v. Manhattan Mini Storage, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv05890
Defendant:
McKinney's Shelter, John Doe, Warren Wilhelm, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Simon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Edwards v. Local 205, Community and Social Agency Employees Union et al
as 1:2018cv01225
Plaintiff:
Michael Edwards
Defendant:
Local 205, Community and Social Agency Employees Union, District Council 1707 , American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees ("AFSCME") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv07591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv04856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
