Cases 1 - 10 of 1,139
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Gomez v. Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Mary Margarita Gomez
Defendant:
Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Schochenmaier v. Gomez et al
as 5:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Ryan Schochenmaier
Defendant:
John Gomez, Jorge Esparza, Juan Galindo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gomez v. USA
as 4:2024cv00366
Petitioner:
Santos Gomez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Silva-Gomez v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00355
Petitioner:
Eric Silva-Gomez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gomez Munoz v. USA
as 3:2024cv00811
Petitioner:
Francisco Antonio Gomez Munoz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Cantu v. The Geo Group, Inc. et al
as 7:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Ivar Cantu
Defendant:
The Geo Group, Inc. and Jaime Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gomez Rapalo et al v. Cotton et al
as 4:2024cv01031
Plaintiff:
Ilsy Odet Gomez Rapalo and B. J. R.G.
Defendant:
Charles D. Cotton, Montgomery Transport LLC, Capacity Lease LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Gomez v. Cutler
as 6:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Martin Gomez
Respondent:
Sheriff Gary Cutler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
