Cases 31 - 40 of 394
SOJKA v. AGUIRRE EXPRESS CORP et al
as 1:2022cv02683
Defendant:
CARLOS AGUIRRE, AGUIRRE EXPRESS CORP, DRIVE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
LYNDA SOJKA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Saenz v. Gonzalez
as 1:2022cv02291
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rodriguez Saenz
Defendant:
Judith Adriana Guevara Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Gonzalez-Flores v. USA
as 1:2022cv02199
Petitioner:
Salvador Gonzalez-Flores
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SOJKA v. AGUIRRE EXPRESS CORP et al
as 4:2022cv00089
Defendant:
CARLOS AGUIRRE, AGUIRRE EXPRESS CORP, DRIVE NEW JERSEY INSUREANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
LYNDA SOJKA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Thomas v. Kemp et al
as 1:2022cv02064
Plaintiff:
Albert Charles Thomas
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Deborah Gonzalez, John W. Donnelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Kemp et al
as 1:2022cv01475
Plaintiff:
Albert C. Thomas
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Deborah Gonzalez, John W. Donnelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thomas v. Kemp et al
as 1:2022cv01372
Plaintiff:
Albert Charles Thomas
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Deborah Gonzalez, John W. Donnelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. United States
as 1:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gonzalez
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Noble
as 1:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gonzalez
Defendant:
Angela E. Noble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Miller
as 1:2021cv05213
Plaintiff:
Marili Duque Gonzalez
Defendant:
Loren K. Miller
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
