Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Richards v. Traditional Sporting Goods Inc et al
as 1:2023cv03145
Plaintiff:
Brendan Yong Richards
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Greg Colburn
Defendant:
Traditional Sporting Goods, Inc.; Ardesa S.A., Traditional Sporting Goods Inc and Ardesa SA
Consolidated Defendant:
William Squires
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Mickelson v. Dicks Sporting Goods Inc
as 2:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
Ian Mickelson
Defendant:
Dicks Sporting Goods Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Dick's Sporting Goods Inc v. Smokey Point Commercial LLC
as 2:2020cv01239
Plaintiff:
Dick's Sporting Goods Inc
Defendant:
Smokey Point Commercial LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smokey Point Commercial, LLC v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
as 2:2017cv01015
Plaintiff:
Smokey Point Commercial LLC
Defendant:
Dick's Sporting Goods Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Hardie Building Products, Inc v. Good Inc
as 3:2013cv05247
Plaintiff:
James Hardie Building Products Inc
Defendant:
Good Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stinson, Jr et al
as 2:2010mc00134
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert Stinson, Jr, Life's Good Inc, Life's Good Stabl Mortgage Fund LLC and others
Receiver:
Kamian Schwartzman
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stinson et al
as 2:2010mc00014
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert Stinson, Jr, Life's Good Inc, Life's Good Stabl Mortgage Fund LLC and others
Washington Shoe Company v. A-Z Sporting Goods Inc
as 2:2009cv01042
Plaintiff:
Washington Shoe Company
Defendant:
A-Z Sporting Goods Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
