Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Goodman v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 0:2024cv03505
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
Amy Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Goodman v. Peters
as 0:2024cv03818
Petitioner:
Isaiah Goodman
Respondent:
Collette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reilly et al v. ASR Group International, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv03250
Defendant:
United Sugar Producers & Refiners Cooperative, Commodity Information, Inc., Domino Foods, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Renee Newton, Mary Reilly, Miranda Cofino and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv02883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Goodman v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02910
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kim Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Goodman et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Timothy Goodman, Brandon Koenig-Messer, Ryan Loibl and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Lindsey v. Kneisel et al
as 0:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Dale Allen Lindsey
Defendant:
Terry Kneisel, Scott Benoit, Thane Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv02648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Prouty v. DHS-MSOP employees et al.
as 0:2021cv02207
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
DHS-MSOP employees, Nicole Kielty, Jessica Joyal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Miles et al
as 0:2021cv02044
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
DHS-MSOP employees, David Miles, Steve Sajdek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
