Cases 1 - 10 of 223
GOODMAN v. C&S WHOLESALE GROCERS, INC.
as 5:2024cv04680
Plaintiff:
ZIEGO GOODMAN
Defendant:
C&S WHOLESALE GROCERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Banks v. Booher et al
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Marvin Banks, Running River, Dale Arnold and others
Defendant:
Superintendent Bradley Booher, Head Chaplain Henry Hansard, Tracy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEON v. HANOCH et al
as 2:2024cv01060
Plaintiff:
EDWIN LEON
Defendant:
NEHAMA HANOCH and CHEYENNE GOODMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Brown v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
as 2:2023cv04805
Plaintiff:
Brittany Brown
Defendant:
HOBBY LOBBY STORES, INC. and Goodman Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Crawford v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Crawford
Defendant:
Dauphin County, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Warden Gregory Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SULLIVAN et al v. TRUIST BANK et al
as 2:2023cv03363
Plaintiff:
JAMES SULLIVAN, JR. and KATHLEEN SULLIVAN
Defendant:
TRUIST BANK, SHAWON GOODMAN and SHEMANE CAVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GOODMAN v. WAHL et al
as 2:2023cv02705
Petitioner:
RAFAEL M. GOODMAN
Respondent:
MARK WAHL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Liptok v. City of Pottsville, PA, et al
as 3:2023cv01303
Plaintiff:
John J. Liptok
Defendant:
City Of Pottsville Pa., et al, City Council, Dorothy Botto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
