Cases 61 - 70 of 121
Howard v. Gordon Law Offices, P.S.C. et al
as 4:2014cv00086
Plaintiff:
Michael Dale Howard
Defendant:
Gordon Law Offices, P.S.C., Michelle Lynn Mattingly, Real Estate Appraisals & Consultants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Bolton et al
as 3:2014cv00580
Plaintiff:
Martin Albert Gordon
Defendant:
Mark Bolton, Dewayne Clark, Eric Troutman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Eversole
as 7:2014cv00081
Plaintiff:
Brenda Carroll
Defendant:
Gordon Eversole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Goodrich Corporation v. PolyOne Corporation et al
as 5:2014cv00068
Plaintiff:
Goodrich Corporation
Defendant:
PolyOne Corporation , Westlake Chemical Corporation , Gordon Doerfer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hue Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Hue
as 2:2014cv00034
Plaintiff:
Hue Enterprises, Inc. and Cork 'n Bottle, Inc.
Defendant:
G. Gordon Hue, Jr.
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Nadine Hue Hellings and Bank of Kentucky
Counter_claimant:
G. Gordon Hue, Jr.
Counter_defendant:
Cork 'n Bottle, Inc. and Hue Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gordon v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00172
Plaintiff:
Donna Gordon
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01163
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Gordon v. USA
as 3:2013cv00948
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Curtis Gordon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gordon v. Turner et al
as 2:2013cv00136
Plaintiff:
Tiffany R. Gordon
Defendant:
Tenorris F. Turner and IFCO Systems US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
