Cases 31 - 40 of 1,401
Graham v. Highberger
as 24-65
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLIFFORD JOE GRAHAM
Respondent / Appellee:
JOSHUA HIGHBERGER, Superintendent Oregon State Correctional Institution
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jackson v. Ventura et al
as 1:2023cv01734
Plaintiff:
Charles Jackson
Defendant:
Marcia G. Ventura, Dr. Graham, Ms. Vickerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Agarwal v. Splunk Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv05680
Plaintiff:
Avantika Agarwal
Defendant:
Splunk Inc., Graham V. Smith, Mark Carges and others
Graham Waldo v. Black and Decker U.S Inc.
as 2:2023cv08427
Plaintiff:
Graham Waldo
Defendant:
Black & Decker (U.S) Inc. and Black and Decker U.S Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Kelly D. Robinson v. C. Fisher et al
as 2:2023cv09405
Plaintiff:
Kelly D. Robinson
Defendant:
C. Fisher, P. Castellanos, J. Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00461
Petitioner:
Michelle Dawn Graham
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Chatfield et al v. Brenntag North America, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01399
Plaintiff:
Elaine Chatfield and Estate of Elsie Louise Graham
Defendant:
Brenntag North America, Inc., Mineral and Pigment Solutions, Inc., Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Graham v. Honeywell International Inc.
as 3:2023cv04865
Plaintiff:
Maxwell A Graham
Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
