Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Tavron v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mose Jackson, III, M Richarson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Graham et al
as 2:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
Franklin Graham, Tyrone Allison, Marcus Etherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunahue v. Payne et al
as 2:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dunahue
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Sarah Sanders, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Lavon Lewis
Defendant:
Chris Johnson, Franklin Leron Graham and Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flemons v. Hatchett et al
as 2:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Aaron Flemons
Defendant:
Emma Hatchett, Angela Douglas, Tracy Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cantrell v. Scofild et al
as 2:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Shane Cantrell
Defendant:
Scofild, M Jackson, D Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01178
Plaintiff:
Micheal Dale Graham
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Smith et al
as 4:2022cv01031
Plaintiff:
Roy Moore and Roy J Moore
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, Chuck Graham, Huggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Griffin et al
as 4:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Joe Griffin, James Moody, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clem v. Counts et al
as 4:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Neil Clem
Defendant:
Anthony Counts, Holden Lester, Darren White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
