Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Harper v. Monnig et al
as 4:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Christopher Louis Harper
Defendant:
Shane Monnig, Timothy Baker, Adam Lemmonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paytient Technologies, Inc. v. Graham
as 4:2023cv01735
Plaintiff:
Paytient Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Jacob Graham
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Graham v. Apple Store et al
as 4:2023cv01509
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Graham
Defendant:
Apple Store, Lens Crafter's, Technical Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. City of St. Louis, Missouri
as 4:2023cv01077
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Ernest Graham
Defendant:
City of St. Louis Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Graham v. United States et al
as 4:2023cv01005
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Ernest Graham
Defendant:
United States, Leitchfield, KY, Jason Woosley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Graham v. U.S. Congress of United States
as 4:2022cv00616
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Ernest Graham
Defendant:
U.S. Congress of United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry III v. Ashcroft et al
as 4:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
Paul Berry III
Defendant:
John R. Ashcroft and State of Missouri
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Joseph Pereles, Matthew Bax, Ike Graham and others
Interpleader:
Derrick Good
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Central Trust Co. et al v. Allen et al
as 4:2021cv01206
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Allen
Defendant:
Central Trust Company, David Allen, Thomas Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
