Cases 1 - 10 of 2,347
Comer & Cross Concrete Coatings, LLC v. Rushing et al
as 2:2024cv11301
Plaintiff:
Comer & Cross Concrete Coatings, LLC
Defendant:
Grant Rushing and MI Floor Coatings, LLC
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
USA v. Grant Davis, Jr.
as 24-11511
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GRANT ELMORE DAVIS, JR.
John Uce v. Oral Aesthetic Advocacy Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03844
Plaintiff:
John Uce
Defendant:
Oral Aesthetic Advocacy Group, Inc. doing business as Cosmetic Dentistry Grants, Navid Zamani DMD Inc. doing business as Dent-All by Dr. Z., Michael Homayun Dental Corporation doing business as Comfort Dental Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Geneva Enterprises, LLC et al v. Chavez et al
as 1:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Geneva Enterprises, LLC and AV Automotive, LLC
Defendant:
Aaron Chavez, Alex Guevara, Ana Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Gibson v. Grant
as 24-1086
Plaintiff:
DONALD GIBSON
Defendant:
Police Officer TERIQ C. GRANT, Shield No. 12175, Detective RYAN OLSEN, Shield #5992 and JOHN DOE, Kings County District Attorney (ADA)
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-1101
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
MICHELLE BIELA, SANTORO, HENRY MUSHI and others
Salem v. Burns et al
as 1:2024cv21509
Plaintiff:
Skylar Salem
Defendant:
William Burns, Chicago Police, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Saintillus v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2493
Plaintiff:
CHALONER SAINTILLUS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PHILLIP A. TALBERT, GRANT RABENN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
