Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Cook v. Grant County Sheriff et al
as 1:2012cv00016
Plaintiff:
Christopher E Cook
Defendant:
Grant County Sheriff and FNU Edris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyson v. Kay et al
as 1:2011cv00378
Plaintiff:
Zar D Dyson
Defendant:
Jay Kay, Warren Dailey, Joshua Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kemp v. Grant County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2011cv00156
Plaintiff:
Ashlee A Kemp
Defendant:
Grant County Sheriff's Department and Corporal Shugart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClung v. Grant County Sheriff
as 1:2011cv00125
Petitioner:
Henry C McClung
Respondent:
Grant County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Westbrook v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2010cv00526
Plaintiff:
Rickie Westbrook, Sr
Defendant:
Indiana State of , Grant County Prosecutor's Office , Lisa Glancey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Grant County Sheriff et al
as 1:2010cv00442
Plaintiff:
Chance J Spencer
Defendant:
Grant County Sheriff, Losure, Purdy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chidester v. Grant County Sheriff
as 1:2010cv00343
Plaintiff:
Daniel Chidester
Defendant:
Grant County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Grant County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2009cv00283
Plaintiff:
Ronald D Fields
Defendant:
Grant County Sheriff's Department, Patrick Kolb, William Barcomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevino v. Tittle et al
as 1:2009cv00248
Plaintiff:
Joel Angel Trevino
Defendant:
Drew Tittle, Josh Zigler, Richard Eastes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COATS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2009cv00595
Plaintiff:
JAROD COATS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, COMMISSIONER, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and GRANT COUNTY SHERIFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
