Cases 71 - 80 of 87
Barksdale v. Culliver (DEATH PENALTY)
as 3:2008cv00327
Plaintiff:
Tony Barksdale, Tony Barksdale, Tony Barksdale and others
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reese v. Culliver et al
as 2:2008cv00697
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Reese
Respondent:
Grantt Culliver and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Perry v. Gandy et al
as 1:2008cv00185
Plaintiff:
Wayne Demetric Perry
Defendant:
Charlene Gandy, Grantt Culliver, Shirley Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shabazz v. Culliver et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2008cv00088
Plaintiff:
Ash-ShaKur Shabazz
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Means v. Culliver et al
as 2:2007cv02326
Petitioner:
Kendell Cottrell Means
Respondent:
Grantt Culliver and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Culliver et al
as 2:2007cv02186
Petitioner:
Maurice Jackson
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivers v. Culliver et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2007cv00894
Plaintiff:
Wallace Rivers
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warren v. Culliver et al
as 1:2007cv00525
Plaintiff:
Doc Eugene Warren
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver, Richard Allen, Delano Benjamin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Culver v. Culliver et al (INMATE3)
as 1:2007cv00595
Plaintiff:
Carrius Culver
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trawick v. Culliver et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2007cv00554
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lamar Trawick
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
