Cases 61 - 70 of 101
McLeod v. Culliver (INMATE 3)
as 1:2009cv00714
Plaintiff:
Jackie McLeod
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pruitt v. Culliver et al
as 1:2009cv00435
Plaintiff:
Leviticus Pruitt
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver, Tyrone Jenkins, Michael Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Culliver et al
as 2:2009cv01270
Petitioner:
Phillip Spencer
Respondent:
Grantt Culliver and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McConico v. Culliver et al
as 1:2009cv00322
Petitioner:
James McConico, Jr.
Respondent:
Grantt Culliver, Troy King and Richard Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivers v. Culliver et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2009cv00524
Plaintiff:
Wallace Rivers
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russo v. Culliver
as 2:2009cv00967
Petitioner:
Victor Joseph Russo
Respondent:
Grantt Culliver and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McConico v. Culliver et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2009cv00428
Plaintiff:
James McConico, Jr.
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver, Troy King and Richard Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hagood v. Summers et al
as 1:2009cv00219
Plaintiff:
William Hagood
Defendant:
Chris Summers, Grantt Culliver and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hagood v. Summers et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00256
Plaintiff:
William Hagood
Defendant:
Chris Summers, Grantt Culliver and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Perkins v. Culliver et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00225
Plaintiff:
James Perkins
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver and Troy King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
