Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Misch et al v. Alameda County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2022cv05278
Plaintiff:
David Misch and Keith H. Washington
Defendant:
Alameda County Sheriff's Office, Aramark, Sheriff Greg Ahern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. Ahern et al
as 4:2020cv01089
Defendant:
Greg Ahern, Alameda County, Solo Powell and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Khaton v. United States of America
as 3:2017cv06978
Petitioner:
Edmond Paul Khaton
Respondent:
United States of America and Greg Ahern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Luong et al v. Alameda County et al
as 4:2017cv06675
Plaintiff:
Dat Thanh Luong , Ai Qiong Zhong and W.L.
Defendant:
Alameda County, Greg Ahern, Thomas Madigan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilkins v. Swafford et al
as 5:2014cv03330
Plaintiff:
Keenan G. Wilkins
Defendant:
Mildred Swafford, Jenifer Chaffin, Brian Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrell v. Ahern
as 4:2014cv00317
Plaintiff:
Hulen T. Harrell
Defendant:
Greg Ahern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Keenan Wilkins v. County of Alameda, et al
as 13-17060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEENAN G. WILKINS, AKA Nerrah Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, GREG AHERN, Sheriff, JAMES AYALA, Captain and others
Keenan Wilkins v. Greg Ahern, et al
as 13-16407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEENAN G. WILKINS, AKA Nerrah Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
GREG AHERN, Sheriff, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CRIMINAL JUSTICE MENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT and others
Axtle et al v. County of Alameda et al
as 4:2012cv06404
Plaintiff:
Ismael Eduardo Axtle, Mario Ochoa Gonzalez and Anthony McGee
Defendant:
County of Alameda, Greg Ahern, Carla Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marks v. Ahern
as 3:2012cv05625
Plaintiff:
Ron L. Marks
Defendant:
Greg Ahern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
