Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Charlie's Gyros, Inc. v. Amplify Energy Corporation, et al
as 8:2021cv01738
Plaintiff:
Charlie's Gyros, Inc., Jennifer Taylor and Greg Taylor
Defendant:
Amplify Energy Corporation, Beta Operating Company, LLC a Texas corporation doing business as Beta Offshore and San Pedro Bay Pipeline Company
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Mark Adams v. Ken Paxton, et al
as 20-40360
Defendant / Appellee:
KEN PAXTON, MARK STAPLES, GREG TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK D. ADAMS
Plumbers, Pipefitters & MES v. Fairfax Financial Holding
as 12-3798
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plumbers, Pipefitters & MES Local Union No. 392 Pension Fund, On behalf of Itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited, Odysseyre Holdings Corp., V. Prem Watsa and others
ACE Medical US, LLC v. Heath, et al
as 1:2011cv05332
Movant:
James Heath , Kathy Lyall , Robert Guldi and others
Respondent:
ACE Medical US, LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Plumbers, Pipefitters & MES Local Union No. 392 Pension Fund v. Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited et al
as 1:2011cv05097
Plaintiff:
Plumbers, Pipefitters & MES Local Union No. 392 Pension Fund
Defendant:
Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited, Odysseyre Holdings Corp., V. Prem Watsa and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
HARRIS et al v. Rubbermaid Medical Solutions
as 3:2010mc00154
Petitioner:
Bryan D. Harris , Mark Taylor and Greg Taylor
Respondent:
Rubbermaid Medical Solutions
Parks v. Fairfax Financial Holdings LTD
as 10-2810
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Parks, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, William Seymour, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, CI Funds Group and others
Movant - Appellant:
Plumbers, Pipefitters & MES Local Union No. 392 Pension Fund
Defendant - Appellee:
Fairfax Financial Holdings LTD, V. Prem Watsa, Trevor Ambridge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
