Cases 11 - 20 of 113
Eaves v. Skramsted et al
as 1:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Rodney Douglas Eaves
Defendant:
Skramsted, Vanessa Carson, Kory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992
Griffith v. El Paso County et al
as 1:2023cv00795
Plaintiff:
Darlene Griffith
Defendant:
El Paso County, Wellpath and Royball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 American with Disabilities Act (ADA- Accommodations)
Pittman v. Long et al
as 1:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Pittman
Defendant:
Jeff Long, Roland Jackson, Landee Zanotelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baumann v. Willams et al
as 1:2022cv02116
Plaintiff:
Gary Baumann, Jr
Defendant:
Dean Willams, Barry Goodrich, Christinan Cappellucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robledo v. Colorado Inmate Bank et al
as 1:2022cv00904
Plaintiff:
C. S. Robledo
Defendant:
Colorado Inmate Bank, C. Alloy, Tonya Whitney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robledo v. Griffith et al
as 1:2021cv03491
Plaintiff:
Craig S. Robledo-Valdez and C. Sebastian Robledo
Defendant:
Marshall Griffith, Travis Trani and Misty Zade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Berg et al
as 1:2021cv03181
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Berg, Gomez, Abbot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robledo-Valdez v. Hansen et al
as 1:2021cv03014
Plaintiff:
Craig S. Robledo-Valdez and C. S. Robledo
Defendant:
Warden Terry Jaques, Travis Marler, carolyn hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
