Cases 31 - 40 of 184
Gebel et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00820
Plaintiff:
Alice Pollman, Joyce Cox, Vanessa Brown and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-20, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cobb v. Madlock et al
as 4:2019cv00262
Defendant:
Cindy Griffith, Donna Wigfall, Tracy Madlock and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cobb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv04058
Defendant:
Cindy Griffith, Dittman, John Gerke and others
Plaintiff:
Roy D. Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mansfield-Whitehorn v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv04057
Defendant:
Cindy Griffith, Keely, Dillon Adkisson and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Lanier Mansfield-Whitehorn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sours et al v. Precythe et al
as 4:2019cv00441
Defendant:
Cindy Griffith, John Ashcroft, Stanley Payne and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene V. LaMartina and William Scott Sours
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashley v. McKinney et al
as 4:2019cv00309
Defendant:
J. Cofield, Cindy Griffith, Loraine Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Ashley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kriebel v. Griffith
as 4:2019cv00142
Petitioner:
Jared Lloyd Kriebel
Respondent:
Cindy Griffith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mansfield-Whitehorn v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 2:2019cv04019
Defendant:
T K Bredeman, Cindy Griffith, Dillon Adkisson and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Lanier Mansfield-Whitehorn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Straub v. Griffith et al
as 1:2019cv00011
Defendant:
Brad Renfro, Cindy Griffith and Brad Rentfro
Plaintiff:
Kevin A. Straub
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Griffith et al
as 2:2019cv00005
Defendant:
Cindy Griffith, Amber Stubenrauch, Tim Woods and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
