Cases 31 - 40 of 196
Griffith v. Saul
as 1:2020cv01661
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Bryan Scott Griffith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GRIFFITH v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04031
Plaintiff:
WELDON GRIFFITH
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. GRIFFITHS et al
as 1:2020cv00202
Defendant:
KELSEA GRIFFITHS and ELECTRIC INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAY v. BRADLEY et al
as 3:2020cv00047
Defendant:
COUNSELOR M. NAGLIC, CASE MANAGER J. SPEILVOGEL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GORAL and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL THOMAS MAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GRIFFITH v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00646
Plaintiff:
MARY GRIFFITH
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CROCKETT et al v. GRIFFTH et al
as 1:2019cv00294
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL CROCKETT and ISSAC CROCKETT
Defendant:
KARA GRIFFTH and KIRK ROBERT GRIFFITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEOLA et al v. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC
as 2:2019cv00997
Defendant:
VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GRIFFITH and MARY ELLEN MEOLA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CAGGIANO et al v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC. et al
as 5:2019cv03074
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. SAMOHOD, DENNIS GRIFFITH, KYLE J. RIGG and others
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC. and TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICALS PRODUCTS R&D, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
GRIFFITH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2019cv02400
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and PHILADELPHIA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Petitioner:
DONALD GRIFFITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ELANSARI v. GOLF CLUB APARTMENTS et al
as 2:2018cv04171
Defendant:
EDWARD GRIFFITH, THOMAS KISTLER, JOHNATHAN GRINE and others
Plaintiff:
AMRO ELANSARI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
