Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Barnes v. Hochul et al
as 9:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant:
Hon. Kath C. Hochul, Richard C. Finnegan, Marisa Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curran-Groome v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2022cv00710
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Curran-Groome
Defendant:
The City Of New York,, Commissioner Dermot Shea, New York City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Groom v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv06119
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Paula Groom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Groom v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2019cv01363
Plaintiff:
Jessica Marie Groom
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bergrin v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv09681
Defendant:
Corecivic, Inc., Dan Polster, Jane Branstetter Stranch and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald A. Bergrin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Walsh et al
as 5:2018cv01155
Defendant:
Brendan Grooms, Angela Mohar, Frank L. Fowler and others
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Grace-Louise Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Groomes et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00960
Defendant:
Doe Defendants 1-10, C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Venable-Groomes and David E Groomes, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
