Cases 1 - 10 of 23
McNeil v. Grooms et al
as 2:2024cv02068
Plaintiff:
Eurika McNeil
Defendant:
Officer Jacob Grooms, City of Goose Creek Police Department and City of Goose Creek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stone v. Georgetown County et al
as 2:2023cv03138
Counter Defendant:
William Allen Stone
Defendant:
Georgetown County, Georgetown County Sheriff, David Law and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grooms et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 0:2022cv00661
Plaintiff:
Dee Grooms and Lowell Grooms
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Aalim Abd'ul'ahad v. Chesterfield Convalescent Center et al
as 4:2022cv00389
Plaintiff:
Bahaadur Aalim Abd'ul'ahad
Defendant:
Chesterfield Convalescent Center, Grace M. Villafranca, Shannon Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grooms v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 6:2021cv03089
Plaintiff:
Thomas Grooms
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Groom v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2019cv03530
Defendant:
Davol Inc, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence A Groom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Grooms et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 4:2019cv02841
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Jean Grooms and Donald Grooms
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hoyt v. Groom et al
as 2:2018cv02800
Defendant:
James Wingett Hill and Simon Crispin Groom
Plaintiff:
Amy Joyce Gunn Hoyt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv02768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Grooms v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 3:2016cv00508
Plaintiff:
Shandra Grooms
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer OY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
