Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Abubardar v. Gross et al
as 1:2020cv11590
Plaintiff:
Raheem Rashed Abubardar
Defendant:
Ismael Henriquez and William G. Gross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arrington v. City of Boston et al
as 1:2020cv11213
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Arrington
Defendant:
City of Boston, John Doe, Horace Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darby et al v. Lelling et al
as 1:2020cv11115
Defendant:
Unknown "John Does" and "Jane Doe" State Police Officers, Maura Healy, Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Plaintiff:
Korey Darby, Darrell Darby, James Darby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holder v. Boston Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv10656
Defendant:
Boston Police Department, William Evans, Shawn Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Alvin Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gross et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2019cv11909
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Nicole Elizabeth Gross and Michael Alan Gross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Connell v. Gross et al
as 1:2019cv11654
Plaintiff:
Robert . O'Connell
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, John McDonough, Angela Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Regis et al v William Gross, et al.
as 1:2019cv10527
Plaintiff:
Jean Regis and Verlande Regis
Defendant:
Matthew Pieroway, William Feeney, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gross v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2018cv12201
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Robert H Gross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grosse v. Warren T. Baxter, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv10917
Plaintiff:
Paul Grosse
Defendant:
Warren T. Baxter, Inc. and Samuel Baxter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gross v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv12970
Plaintiff:
John Francis Gross
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
