Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Grubb v. Syngenta Corp LLC et al
as 3:2024pq01309
Plaintiff:
Paul M Grubb
Defendant:
Syngenta Corp LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young v. Adkins et al
as 2:2024cv02064
Plaintiff:
Jacob Daniel Young
Defendant:
Felicia Adkins, Jennifer Chacon, . Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beck et al v. Driveline Retail Merchandising, Inc.
as 3:2023cv03282
Plaintiff:
Kiersten Beck, Christine Lynn Barrett-Bukowski, Bridgette Boyd and others
Defendant:
Driveline Retail Merchandising, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Grubbs v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07634
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Grubbs
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Grubbs v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06247
Plaintiff:
Karen Grubbs
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., Soft Sheen-Carson LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Grubbs-Mahood v. Smith
as 1:2022cv01216
Petitioner:
Cindy Grubbs-Mahood
Respondent:
Matt Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Grubbs v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 3:2021cv01448
Plaintiff:
Randall Scott Grubbs
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Grubbs v. McFarland et al
as 1:2020cv01075
Plaintiff:
Matthew Grubbs
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe 2, Amy L McFarland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00028
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
