Cases 21 - 30 of 77
Levine v. Grubhub Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11742
Plaintiff:
Stephen Levine
Defendant:
Grubhub Holdings Inc. and Grubhub Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grubhub Inc. et al v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 1:2021cv05312
Counter Defendant:
Grubhub Inc. and Takeaway.com Central Core B.V.
Counter Claimant:
The Kroger Co.
Defendant:
Relish Labs, LLC and Relish Labs LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
DoorDash, Inc. et al v. City Of New York
as 1:2021cv07564
Plaintiff:
DoorDash, Inc., Grubhub Inc. and Portier, LLC
Defendant:
City Of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doordash, Inc. et al v. City and County of San Francisco
as 3:2021cv05502
Plaintiff:
Doordash, Inc. and GrubHub Inc.
Defendant:
San Francisco City and County and City and County of San Francisco
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United State of America and California Chamber of Commerce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Stout v. GrubHub Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv04745
Defendant:
GrubHub Inc. and DOES 1-50
Plaintiff:
Jesse Stout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Micheli & Shel, LLC v. Grubhub Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04995
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc., Postmates LLC, Seamless North America LLC and others
Lead Plaintiff:
Micheli & Shel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ryan v. Grubhub Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04865
Defendant:
David Fisher, Keith Richman, Katrina Lake and others
Plaintiff:
John Ryan
Luftig v. Grubhub Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04704
Defendant:
David Fisher, Keith Richman, Katrina Lake and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Luftig
WATERMAN v. GRUBHUB INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02414
Defendant:
DAVID FISHER, KEITH RICHMAN, DAVID HABIGER and others
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Heilmeier v. Grubhub, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04687
Defendant:
David Fisher, Keith Richman, Katrina Lake and others
Plaintiff:
Max Heilmeier
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
