Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Adame et al v. Cactus Drilling Company LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Rolando Adame, Adan Chavez, Victor Manuel Perez Barragan and others
Defendant:
Cactus Drilling Company LLC and Christopher Eugnen Akin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Gonzalez Garcia v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2022cv00541
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Gonzalez Garcia
Defendant:
Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Gonzalez
as 4:2020cv01233
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Maria Guadalupe Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gonzalez v. Clear Blue Insurance Company. DONOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED.
as 4:2019cv02246
Defendant:
Clear Blue Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Jose Guadalupe Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Molina v. Mayer
as 2:2018cv01543
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Gonzalez Molina
Defendant:
R Mayer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jose Gonzalez-Gutierrez v. Elaine Duke, Acting Secretary
as 17-60627
Petitioner:
JOSE GUADALUPE GONZALEZ-GUTIERREZ
Respondent:
ELAINE C. DUKE, ACTING SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
USA v. Jesus Gonzalez
as 15-51092
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JESUS GUADALUPE GONZALEZ
Felipe Casas, et al v. Pioneer Hi-Bred Intl, Inc.
as 15-41478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN AVILA, GUADALUPE GONZALEZ, JOSE HERRERA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED
Arizpe et al v. TCSI Transland, Inc. et al
as 7:2015cv00264
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Y Arizpe
Defendant:
TCSI Transland, Inc. and Guadalupe Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
