Cases 1 - 10 of 595
West-Bogans v. Guido et al
as 1:2024cv00717
Plaintiff:
Angela West-Bogans and Angela West
Defendant:
Judge Edward Guido, Judge Claudia Brewbaker, Judge Albert Masland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
McCarty v. Allyrides, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
James McCarty
Defendant:
ALLYRIDES, LLC and Melissa Guido
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tarman v. Allyrides LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Donald Tarman
Defendant:
Allyrides LLC and Melissa Guido
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Subotovsky et al v. White et al
as 1:2024cv01549
Plaintiff:
Hugo Subotovsky and Guido Subotovsky
Defendant:
Pastor Kyshawn Cedric White, Second Providence Baptist Church and Second Providence Baptist Church, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
Guido-Melgar v. Garland
as 24-944
Petitioner:
SONIA STEFANY GUIDO-MELGAR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sanderson v. Reali et al
as 1:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Dwight Sanderson
Defendant:
Kenneth M. Reali, Susan M. Stalnecker, William A. Hawkins, III and others
(PC) Ginochio v. Rickett, et al
as 1:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Guido V. Ginochio
Defendant:
B. Rickett and D. Berginolzen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ginochio v. Rickett, et al
as 2:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Guido V. Ginochio
Defendant:
B. Rickett, D. Berginolzen and D. Bergwolzen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
