Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Gunna Touring, LLC v. Mickle and Mickle Productions et al
as 2:2026cv02842
Plaintiff:
GUNNA TOURING, LLC
Defendant:
MICKLE AND MICKLE PRODUCTIONS, DAPHNEY MICKLE GOLDEN, STARS IN ACTION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
M99 STUDIOS, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company v. GUNNA TOURING, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company
as 3:2026cv00085
Plaintiff:
M99 STUDIOS, LLC
Defendant:
GUNNA TOURING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
M99 Studios, LLC v. Gunna Touring, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company
as 2:2026cv00288
Plaintiff:
M99 Studios, LLC
Defendant:
Gunna Touring LLC
Counter-Claimant:
Gunna Touring LLC
Counter-Defendant:
M99 Studios, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States of America v. Boykin (McLean)
as 25-1986
Defendant:
ANTHONY BOYKIN, PAUL ARLINE, JOSEPH MCLEAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv02346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
US v. Daniel Mathis
as 25-4240
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DANIEL LAMONT MATHIS, a/k/a Gunna, a/k/a Mooch, a/k/a D-Man
United States of America v. Echevarria (Rivera)
as 25-326
Defendant:
TJON MACOLL, ANDREW ECHEVARRIA, JONATHAN RODRIGUEZ and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Boykin (Jacklyn)
as 24-1817
Defendant:
SEAN COTTON, ANTHONY BOYKIN, RAHSAAN MELVIN and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Echevarria (Heyward)
as 24-1060
Defendant:
TJON MACOLL, ANDREW ECHEVARRIA, JONATHAN RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Echevarria (Simmons)
as 24-938
Defendant:
NAQUANN SIMMONS, TJON MACOLL, ANDREW ECHEVARRIA and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
