Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv07695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ulusemre, et al v. Kansas State Department of Education, et al
as 26-3161
Appellant:
TOLGA ULUSEMRE and XIAOLEI XU
Defendant:
MICHELLE DOMBROSKY, MELISSA HILLMAN, MARK SCHMIDT and others
Counter-Claimant:
BLUE VALLEY BOARD OF EDUCATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Nikhil Gupta v. 2ndWave LLC, et al
as 26-7141
Plaintiff:
Nikhil Gupta
Defendant:
2ndWave LLC and Keith Taylor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gupta v. Goyal et al
as 2:2026cv04133
Plaintiff:
Gunjan Gupta
Defendant:
Sanjiv Goyal, Amit Goel, Droisys, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00540
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Morales & Medina Therapy, Corp. et al
as 1:2026cv24627
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Co., Geico Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Morales & Medina Therapy, Corp., D.O. Bradley M. White, Juan C. Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-4155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
