Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Vakas v. Starmount Life Insurance Company
as 6:2024cv01050
Plaintiff:
Gus Vakas
Defendant:
Starmount Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Vakas v. Minnesota Life Insurance Company
as 6:2024cv01039
Plaintiff:
Gus Vakas
Defendant:
Minnesota Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Vakas v. Securian Life Insurance Company et al
as 6:2024cv01040
Plaintiff:
Gus Vakas
Defendant:
Securian Life Insurance Company and Minnesota Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Vakas v. Federal Insurance Company
as 6:2024cv01034
Plaintiff:
Gus Vakas
Defendant:
Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Flowers v. Gus's Fried Chicken - Kansas City
as 2:2023cv02144
Plaintiff:
Tanesha Flowers
Defendant:
Gus's Fried Chicken - Kansas City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Nathanson et al v. Tortoise Capital Advisors, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2022cv02328
Plaintiff:
Howard Nathanson and Gus Gordon
Defendant:
Tortoise Capital Advisors, L.L.C., Conrad S. Ciccotello, Rand C. Berney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anderson v. Wilcox et al
as 6:2019cv01263
Defendant:
Gordon Ramsey, Gregg Wilcox, Kurt Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hankins v. Owens
as 5:2009cv03249
Plaintiff:
Gus Hankins, Jr
Defendant:
Clark V. Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vakas et al v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
as 6:2008cv01127
Plaintiff:
Gus Vakas and George Vakas
Defendant:
Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Paloian v. Intravartolo
as 2:2008mc00208
Plaintiff:
Gus A. Paloian
Defendant:
Russell W. Intravartolo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
