Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Rachel Adin LLC v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP
as 1:2023cv11167
Plaintiff:
Rachel Adin LLC New York limited liability company doing business as OX and Rachel Adin LLC doing business as OX
Defendant:
H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sally v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP
as 4:2023cv01451
Plaintiff:
Randall Sally
Defendant:
H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Lizama et al v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP
as 4:2022cv01170
Plaintiff:
Abraham Lizama and Marc Doten
Defendant:
H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv81331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Commodore v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP
as 7:2022cv06247
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Commodore
Defendant:
H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Nguyen v. H & M Hennes & Mauritz, LP et al
as 1:2022cv00987
Plaintiff:
Sandy Nguyen
Defendant:
H & M Hennes & Mauritz, LP, H & M Hennes & Mauritz GBC AB, LLC, Keith Dent and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Simon J. Burchett Photography, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP
as 1:2021cv07089
Plaintiff:
Simon J. Burchett Photography, Inc.
Defendant:
H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv21012
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
