Cases 21 - 30 of 31
PENICK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al
as 2:2012cv00341
Defendant:
JULIE ANN BEIGHLEY, H. LAPPIN, H. M. MARBERRY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD PENICK
Name Unknow:
PRISON CONTRACT OPTOMETRIST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Larry Banks v. Hector M. Fuentes, et al
as 12-3056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY M. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
H. M. FUENTES, Peace Officer, Chicago Police Department (#11396) (pcot69) and I. R. LOPEZ, Peace Officer, Chicago Police Department (#13516) (pcoy103)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edstrom v. H & M Limousine Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv07432
Plaintiff:
Leslie Edstrom
Defendant:
H & M Limousine Service, Inc., Tom Pepper, Penny Pepper and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
American Maritime Officers Union v. H&M Lake Transport, Ltd.
as 1:2009cv02949
Plaintiff:
American Maritime Officers Union and American Maritime Officers Union
Defendant:
H&M Lake Transport, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
American Maritime Officers Union v. H&M Lake Transport, Ltd.
as 1:2009cv01593
Plaintiff:
American Maritime Officers Union and American Maritime Officers Union
Defendant:
H&M Lake Transport, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv06297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
