Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Walgreen Co. et al v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv09793
Plaintiff:
H-E-B, L.P., Walgreen Co., Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Hetero USA Inc., Allergan, Inc., Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv08780
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walgreen Co. et al v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv10049
Plaintiff:
H-E-B, L.P., The Kroger Co., Walgreen Co. and others
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA L.P., ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS, L.P., HANDA PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Walgreen CO et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv09861
Plaintiff:
Walgreen CO, The Kroger Co., H-E-B LLP and others
Defendant:
Endo International PLC, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Par Pharmaceutical Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
In re Novartis and Par Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2018cv04361
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Drogueria Betances, LLC, H-E-B LP, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp., and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc., Turlock Irrigation District and UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund
Respondent:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Lupin Ltd., Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., OptumRX, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Caremark PHC, LLC and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
C H A B Five Realty, LLC et al v. Town of Monroe et al
as 7:2017cv07300
Plaintiff:
C H A B Five Realty, LLC , Golden Ray, LLC and Eagle Ridge Estates, LLC
Defendant:
Town of Monroe, Town of Monroe Town Board, Harley Doles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
