Cases 1 - 10 of 67
BUTLER v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2011cv00289
Plaintiff:
STACY L. BUTLER
Defendant:
C.O. M. DIEODORFF, LT. HOWARD, LT. B. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MILLER V. MARBERRY ET AL.
as 2:2011cv00262
Nurse:
NURSE HADDIX
Warden:
H. J. MARBERRY
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ALLEN MILLER
Correctional Officer:
CHAPLIN ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
CLARK vs MARBERRY
as 2:2011cv00133
Petitioner:
RAPHAEL CLARK
Respondent:
H. J. MARBERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CLINTON v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2011cv00104
Defendant:
LT. BRACE, R. GALILION and H. J. MARBERRY
Plaintiff:
JACQUES CLINTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BUTLER v. FEDERAL B.O.P. et al
as 1:2010cv01568
Plaintiff:
STACY L. BUTLER
Defendant:
C.O. M. DIEODORFF, FEDERAL B.O.P., L.T. HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CLARK v. MARBERRY
as 2:2010cv00285
Petitioner:
PATRICK CLARK
Respondent:
H. J. MARBERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
YARBOROUGH v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2010cv00273
Defendant:
J. BEIGHLEY, ASSOCIATE WARDEN T.K. COZZA-RHODES, R.N. MS. DANIEL and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE YARBOROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YARBOROUGH v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2010cv00267
Defendant:
MS. J. BEIGHLEY, T.K. COZZA-RHODES, MS. DANIELS and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE YARBOROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2010cv01127
Plaintiff:
STACY L. BUTLER
Defendant:
C.O. M. DIEODORFF, FEDERAL B.O.P., L.T. HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAUL v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2010cv00180
Defendant:
CHURCH, JOHN DOE(S), JOHN EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY WILLIAM PAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
