Cases
Diaz v. Washburn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00796
Plaintiff: Enrique Zacarias Diaz
Defendant: Oregon Department of Corrections, S. Washburn and H. Nevil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Matthews v. Debra Hascall, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-35949
Defendant: CITY OF PENDLETON, COUNTY OF UMATILLA, OR, Individually and in their official capacities
Defendant / Appellee: J. PECK, Assistant Superintendent at EOCI, MITCH MORROW, Deputy Director of ODOC, RILEY, Correctional Officer at EOCI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL J. MATTHEWS
Matthews v. Carey et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01618
Defendant: B. Amsberry, Mitch Morrow, Kevin Brockcamp and others
Plaintiff: Daniel J. Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Gurule v. Jeri Taylor, et al
as 18-35544
Plaintiff - Appellant: RICHARD EVERETT LEE GURULE
Defendant - Appellee: JERI TAYLOR, D. WETTLAUFER, D. LOZIER and others
Matthews v. Hascall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00785
Defendant: Brian Belleque, Kim Brockamp, City of Pendleton, County of Umatilla, OR and others
Plaintiff: Daniel J. Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gurule v. Taylor et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv02260
Defendant: L. Beamer, J. Dafoe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff: Richard E. Gurule
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEVILLE et al v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv67730
Plaintiff: PATRICIA S. NEVILLE and WILLIAM H. NEVILLE
Defendant: ACANDS, INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., BABCOCK & WILCOX CO. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
ThirdParty Defendant: MANVILLE ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?