Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Conley v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Conley
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Dr. B. Mullins, MD, Dr. H. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Day v. Walker et al
as 3:2020cv00089
Defendant:
Sgt. J. Woods, Sgt. D. Biggerstaff, Sgt. P. Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Manis et al
as 7:2019cv00258
Defendant:
Maj. Anderson, T. N. Bailey, C/O Moseley and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Robert Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Bailey et al
as 1:2015cv01590
Plaintiff:
William H. Smith
Defendant:
Christopher Bailey, Robert Sodorsky, Louis Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Iraldo v. Smith
as 2:2014cv00126
Plaintiff:
Dahson D. Iraldo
Defendant:
Officer J. H. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00778
Plaintiff:
James H. Smith
Defendant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Samuel I. White, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Foreclosure
United States of America v. Smith et al
as 1:2011cv00420
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
William H. Smith, Linda R. Smith, HSBC Bank USA, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Smith v. Carilion Medical Center
as 7:2010cv00114
Defendant:
Carilion Medical Center
Plaintiff:
Sharon H. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Bowling v. Ivy H. Smith Company, LLC
as 1:2010cv00055
Plaintiff:
Craig Bowling
Defendant:
Ivy H. Smith Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Maddox v. Johnson et al
as 7:2009cv00179
Plaintiff:
Melvin Corey Maddox
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, Fred Shilling, Tracy S. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
