Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hunter et al v. Rhino Shield et al
as 2:2018cv01097
Defendant:
Steven C Dominique, AmCoat Technologies Incorporated, AmCoat Industries Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Executor Mark D Hunter, Ruth A Hunter and Mark D Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CSX Transportation Inc. v. Williams
as 3:2016cv02242
Plaintiff:
CSX Transportation Inc.
Defendant:
David H Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. USA
as 1:2016cv01559
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Troy H. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Occupy Defiance et al v. City of Defiance, Ohio et al
as 3:2013cv02339
Plaintiff:
Occupy Defiance , Jacob Gallman , Mara Watson and others
Defendant:
City of Defiance, Ohio, Robert Armstrong, David H Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
University of Cincinnati Chapter of Young Americans for Liberty et al v. University of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2012cv00155
Plaintiff:
University of Cincinnati Chapter of Young Americans for Liberty and Christopher Morbitzer
Defendant:
Gregory H Williams , Corinn Shemak , Cathy Krumpelbeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Octapharma USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02250
Plaintiff:
Ireta M. Williams and Anthony H. Williams
Defendant:
Octapharma USA, Inc. , Octapharma and John Doe and/or John Doe Inc. I-V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. Lowes Home Centers Inc.
as 1:2009cv01442
Plaintiff:
Anna H Williams and Tedd Williams
Defendant:
Lowes Home Centers Inc., Lowes Home Centers Inc. and Lowes Home Centers Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Time Warner Cable, NEO Division v. MD3 Crosstown LLC, et al
as 1:2007cv02296
Plaintiff:
Time Warner Cable, NEO Division, Time Warner Cable, NEO Division and Time Warner Cable, NEO Division
Defendant:
MD3 Crosstown LLC, Marlon F. Davis, XYZ Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Violation of Illegal Interception of Cable System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
