Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Haggerty v. Motorola Post Employment Health Benefits Plan
as 1:2011cv00650
Plaintiff:
Phillip Haggerty
Defendant:
Motorola Post Employment Health Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Mason et al v. The Institute of Allied Medical Professions, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02575
Plaintiff:
Mary Mason and Grace Mevers
Defendant:
The Institute of Allied Medical Professions, Inc., Thomas Haggerty, Lauren West and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Hancock et al v. Allison Haggerty Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc.
as 1:2008cv07146
Plaintiff:
Terrence J Hancock, Terrence J Hancock, Terrence J Hancock and others
Defendant:
Allison Haggerty Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Trustees of The Automobile Mechanics' Industry Welfare and Pension Funds Local 701 v. Allison Haggerty Buick/Pontiac, Inc.
as 1:2008cv07015
Plaintiff:
Trustees of The Automobile Mechanics' Industry Welfare and Pension Funds Local 701
Defendant:
Allison Haggerty Buick/Pontiac, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ciaglia et al v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
as 0:2007cv03445
Plaintiff:
Anne K Ciaglia, Anne K Ciaglia, Anne K Ciaglia and others
Defendant:
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hill et al v. Apartment Investment and Management Company et al
as 1:2007cv01492
Plaintiff:
Mark Hill, Polo Aguirre, Jose Baca and others
Defendant:
Apartment Investment and Management Company, AIMCO Properties, L.P., NHP Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gregoire, et al v. Lucent Technologies, et al
as 6:2003cv00251
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Gregoire, Nicholas R. Frisco, Salvatore N. Mancuso and others
Defendant:
Lucent Technologies, Inc. and Agere Systems, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Jay M. Cohen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
