Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Hamilton v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Hamilton
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fourstar v. Eliason et al
as 4:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Eliason, Lawrence Hamilton and Floyd Azure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Fort Peck Tribal Jail
as 4:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
Ralph Hamilton
Defendant:
Fort Peck Tribal Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton & Company et al v. Montana Rail Link et al
as 2:2016cv00031
Plaintiff:
Hamilton & Company , Certified Public Accountants , Manhattan Midtown LLP and others
Defendant:
Montana Rail Link , Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hamilton v. MHNet
as 4:2015cv00110
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hamilton
Defendant:
MHNet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reid v. Mabus et al
as 1:2015cv00077
Plaintiff:
Jesse Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Sam Erhart, NCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
U.S. Bank National Association v. Birmingham USPS et al
as 4:2012mc00001
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Birmingham USPS, Douglas Customs, Sierra Vista DE and others
Receiver:
Gray & Associates
Hamilton v. USA
as 9:2012cv00037
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Garry Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pinkal et al v. City of Hamilton et al
as 9:2012cv00003
Plaintiff:
Mark Pinkal and Nadine Pinkal
Defendant:
City of Hamilton , Nic Painter, Stacy McElderry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spreadbury v. Bitterroot Public Library et al
as 9:2011cv00064
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Spreadbury
Defendant:
Bitterroot Public Library , City of Hamilton , Lee Enterprises Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
