Cases 1 - 10 of 12
CURRY v. SCHILLING et al
as 1:2022cv02465
Plaintiff:
DONTE CURRY
Defendant:
RACHAEL SCHILLING, HANNAH WINNINGHAM, J. BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBSON v. CAMPBELL et al
as 1:2022cv02243
Plaintiff:
LIONEL GIBSON
Defendant:
K. CAMPBELL, KRUL, HANNAH WINNINGHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. NWANNUNNU et al
as 1:2022cv01708
Plaintiff:
JACK EDWARDS, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN NWANNUNNU, R. SCHILLING, HANNAH WINNINGHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MISHLER v. WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv00781
Plaintiff:
PAUL L. MISHLER, JR.
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, M. MITCHEFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2022cv00719
Plaintiff:
JASON REED
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, CENTURION HEALTH, GEO CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYS v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00651
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. MAYS
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC., CENTURION HEALTH, WEXFORD OF INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv03109
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW S. BROOKS
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUIZ v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00246
Defendant:
HANNAH WINNINGHAM, ELLIOT, TERRY and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO RUIZ, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LESTER v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2020cv01410
Defendant:
ADAMS, WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, WORTH and others
Plaintiff:
DEAJAY LESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv04750
Defendant:
HANNAH WINNINGHAM, FISHER, O. OGIKE and others
Plaintiff:
FREDDIE BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
