Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Grayson et al v. Sichel et al
as 5:2011ct03262
Plaintiff:
Johnny Grayson and Douglas Van Vleet
Defendant:
Lawrence Sichel, Tracy Johns, Carlos Dushesne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTORO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ET AL.,
as 1:2011cv00537
Plaintiff:
MARIO FERNANDO SANTORO
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FMC BUTNER, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
YOUNG v. LAPPIN et al
as 5:2011hc02103
Petitioner:
Theodore Donald Young
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin, Sara Revell and Tracy W. Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grebe v. Revell et al
as 5:2011hc02010
Petitioner:
Jack Abbott Grebe, Jr.
Respondent:
Sara Revell and Harley G. Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Romney v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 5:2010hc02214
Petitioner:
Makonnen Romney
Respondent:
Attorney General of the United States, Harrell Watts, Harley G. Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Scinto v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2010ct03165
Plaintiff:
PAUL SCINTO, SR.
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons , Harley G. Lappin , KIM M. WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burt v. Johns et al
as 5:2010ct03156
Plaintiff:
Yolonda Deyvonne Burt
Defendant:
Tracy W. Johns, C. Brummell, J. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shipley v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 5:2010ct03153
Plaintiff:
Lloyd D. Shipley
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons , US Department of Justice , Harley G. Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Snyder et al
as 5:2009hc02080
Petitioner:
Alfonso Lumorris Wilson
Respondent:
George Snyder and Harley G. Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anderson v. Lappin, et al
as 5:2009hc02071
Petitioner:
Will Anderson
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin and John Joe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
